What is Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
A Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) is a type of scientific experiment that aims to reduce bias when testing a new treatment or intervention. The participants are randomly allocated into either the experimental group (receiving the intervention) or the control group (receiving a placebo or standard treatment).
RCT in Causal Inference
RCTs are foundational in causal inference, providing a high degree of internal validity. The random assignment of subjects into control and treatment groups helps eliminate confounding variables—factors that could influence the outcome other than the treatment itself. As such, any difference in outcomes between the groups can be attributed to the intervention, thus establishing a causal link.
RCTs and Counterfactuals
RCTs are built on the concept of counterfactuals, which answer the question:
What would have happened to the same individual in the absence of the treatment?
Since we can't simultaneously expose and not expose the same individual to a treatment, we instead rely on the control group as a stand-in for the counterfactual. The control group represents the counterfactual outcome for the treatment group, given the assumption that, on average, the two groups are identical except for the exposure to the treatment. This counterfactual framework is what allows us to infer causality from the results of an RCT.
Designing an RCT
The process of designing an RCT involves several key steps. First, a clear research question and hypothesis must be formulated, usually involving a comparison of outcomes between two or more groups. Participants are then recruited, and eligibility criteria are defined to ensure that the sample represents the population of interest.
Random assignment of participants to the treatment or control group is the next critical step. This process ensures that any differences in outcome between groups can be attributed to the intervention rather than pre-existing differences between the participants.
The treatment group then receives the intervention, while the control group receives a placebo or the standard treatment. Both groups are monitored over a specified period, and data on the outcomes of interest are collected.
The final stage involves statistical analysis of the collected data to assess the effect of the intervention. Depending on the study design, this might involve comparing the mean outcome measures between the treatment and control groups or analyzing the time until an event occurs.
Limitations of RCTs
While RCTs are the gold standard for determining the efficacy of an intervention, they are not without limitations. For instance, they can be expensive and time-consuming to conduct, particularly for rare conditions or long-term outcomes.
Blinding, the practice of keeping participants and researchers unaware of which group participants are in, can sometimes be difficult to achieve. If blinding is not possible or is compromised during the study, it can introduce bias.
Moreover, while randomization helps to balance known and unknown confounding variables across groups, it does not eliminate the potential for hidden biases due to factors that are not evenly distributed.
Ethical considerations can also present challenges. For instance, it might not be ethical to withhold a treatment from the control group if that treatment has been proven effective.
Case Studies
Health Sciences
RCTs have made substantial contributions to the field of health sciences. For instance, the effectiveness of many pharmaceuticals on the market today was established through RCTs.
One noteworthy example is the discovery of the efficacy of the polio vaccine. In the 1950s, an RCT involving nearly 2 million children was conducted to test the effectiveness of the vaccine developed by Jonas Salk. The trial conclusively demonstrated that the vaccine was safe and effective, leading to widespread vaccination campaigns that have nearly eradicated polio worldwide.
Social Sciences
RCTs have also been effectively utilized in social sciences. For example, in the field of education, RCTs have been used to assess the impact of various interventions on student performance.
One such study investigated the effect of smaller class sizes on academic achievement. Schools were randomly assigned to have smaller or regular class sizes, and student performance was measured over time. The study found that students in smaller classes performed significantly better, providing strong evidence that class size can directly impact academic performance.
References
Ryusei Kakujo
Focusing on data science for mobility
Bench Press 100kg!